pons, as drawn by the village

$PONS TERMINAL

the kappa village reads the pond
consulting the dish…
reading the chain…

PRICE & MARKET CAP

What one $PONS costs right now, what the whole supply is worth, and how many wallets hold it.

price, market cap and liquidity from DexScreener; holder count from Blockscout; candles from GeckoTerminal. all live.

price
 
market cap
price × circulating
fdv
 
24h volume ($PONS pair)
 
liquidity
 
holders
via blockscout

IS THE BUYBACK STILL RUNNING?

Pons uses trading fees to buy $PONS off the market and destroy it, a bit at a time. Buying supports the price, so it matters whether it is still happening — and whether the wallet doing it still has money left.

the "engine wallet" is the address that sent every burn in the scan window, found by reading the burn logs themselves — not self-reported. balance read live from the chain; cadence, pauses and deferred clips derived from 7 days of burn logs. when the engine goes quiet, fees keep accruing, so burns are deferred rather than cancelled.

reading the engine…
money left to buy with
buyback fuel on hand
since last burn
 
usual gap between burns
between burns · 7d
last burn
$PONS destroyed
burns · last 7 days
 
burns skipped while idle
while idle, at median cadence
how long the wallet lasts
wallet ÷ est. cost per clip
fees taken per $1 burned
24h protocol fees ÷ value destroyed
pause beganidle forburns skippedstatus
reading burn logs…

HOW MANY TOKENS ARE GONE?

Burned tokens are sent somewhere nobody can spend them, so they leave circulation permanently. The more that burns, the smaller the remaining supply.

$PONS held at the dead address, read straight from the chain, against total supply. the 24h figure is what the buyback engine destroyed recently — the lifetime total also includes any tokens retired at launch, so the two are not the same thing.

share of supply destroyed
of total supply
tokens destroyed, all time
 
burned · last 24h
from log scan
separate burns · 24h
 
0%supply consumed100%

IS PONS WINNING ITS CHAIN?

Pons is one of several launchpads competing on Robinhood Chain. Fees are what a launchpad earns when people trade on it, so whoever earns most is being used most — and usage is what pays for the buybacks.

every launchpad on the chain ranked by total fees over 24h, with the 7-day figure beneath since one day can mislead. fees — not protocol revenue — because fees track usage, while revenue mostly reflects how much each launchpad keeps for itself: pons keeps only ~24% and passes the rest to token creators, some rivals keep nearly all of it, and NOXA publishes no revenue split at all — so fees is the only measure every rival can be compared on. the fee ranking covers launchpads only — raw Uniswap pool fees are excluded because graduated pons tokens trade there too, so counting them against pons would be counting pons against itself. pools.trade — Uniswap's own launchpad and the direct new rival — is now indexed by DefiLlama and ranks in the bars below on the same fee basis as everyone else; the stat above adds the live DexScreener volume of its top 25 launches (list dated 2026-08-08) as a usage read, since it publishes no revenue split. field from DefiLlama, which indexes Pons V1 and V2 separately — the $PONS bar sums the family. CashCat is not on DefiLlama at all, so its own public on-chain numbers are converted at the live ETH price.

$PONS share of launchpad fees
24h, among launchpads
rank among all apps on chain
all protocols by fees
launchpads with real volume
≥$1k fees in 24h
next rival
 
pools.trade 24h volume
Uniswap's own launchpad · live
counting banners…

CHEAP OR EXPENSIVE VS OTHERS?

A way to compare tokens of different sizes: divide what the market values the token at by the money the protocol actually earns in a year. A lower number means you are paying less for each $1 it earns — though a low number can also mean the market doubts the earnings will last.

market cap ÷ revenue annualized from the trailing 7 days. only launchpads with a traded token can carry a multiple — the tokenless rivals above have no price to compare, which is why they are not here.

launchpadmarket caprevenue 24hrevenue / yrmarket cap ÷ revenue
asking the other villages…
market cap ÷ yearly revenueshorter bar = cheaper per $1 of revenue
brewing tea…

IS REVENUE GROWING?

Revenue is the money the protocol earns from trading fees. Growing revenue means more people are using Pons; shrinking revenue means the opposite, and it is what ultimately funds the buybacks.

daily protocol revenue straight from DefiLlama (live, not a snapshot): this week against last week, plus a projection that simply assumes the same growth rate repeats. that projection is a straight line drawn on a moving river — it is shown dashed for a reason, and it is not a forecast.

rev · last 7d
 
rev · prior 7d
baseline
naive est · next 7d
if the current holds
best day in window
 

HOW BIG IS PONS, REALLY?

Numbers mean little without something to measure them against. This puts Pons revenue beside protocols you have probably heard of, so you can judge the scale for yourself.

the same DefiLlama revenue measure applied to every line, last 24h. these are mature protocols on far older chains — this is a sense of scale today, not a prediction about what lasts.

asking the wider world…

HOW BUSY IS THE LAUNCHPAD?

How many new tokens people launch on Pons each day, how much they trade, and how much money the creators have earned. This is the raw activity that everything else on this page depends on.

indexed on-chain data from Dune (by adam_tehc). this history is a dated snapshot rather than a live feed — the date is in the footnote below. trade counts are omitted because the upstream query currently returns zero for every day, and a number we know is wrong is worse than no number.

launches · 24h
 
volume · 24h
 
launches · all time
 
creator earnings · all time
paid to devs
unique developers
 
daily volume
daily launches

VILLAGE NOTICE